Olympic Competition Enhanced By the Gear Involved
Posted on July 27, 2012
Filed Under Technology | Leave a Comment
Enjoy the London Olympics over the next week, but recognize that they’re not absolutely “fair” in terms of achieved technological advantages, any more than the rest of sports, down to the Little League level.
Craig Chamberlain on the Phys.org blog writes that competition in sports is as much between the scientists and engineers who produce athletic equipment as the athletes themselves. “In sport,” says Rayvon Fouché, a historian of technology at the University of Illinois and a former cyclist, “there’s very little incentive to play fair, and there are huge incentives to try to get an advantage.” The real distinction, he adds, is between legal and illegal advantages. Fouchè is working on a book about sports technology and the future of athletic competition.
So when you’re watching sprints, pole vaulting or any other Olympic event, remember that you’re watching a combination of skill, physical conditioning and technological advantage in terms of the athletic gear involved.
“The goal of sport is to get the largest legal advantage you can,” says Fouchè, who was an elite-level amateur cyclist. “It’s not about fairness; it’s about inequalities.” At least at the Olympic level, though, all the athletes are presumed to have access to whatever legal equipment they need to enhance their performance. But that can make a crucial difference when outcomes are decided by a fraction of a second.
It may be true, as Fouchè contends, that “we haven’t decided what we want sport to be in light of rapid technological advancements.” Possibly in an absolute sense, that’s so. But, especially at the Olympics, we want athletic competition to be rousing and exciting, and that’s achieved, in no small part, by the equipment underpinning the athletes’ performances, along with their native ability and conditioning. We’re not going to return, thank heaven, to the days of the Greeks when the athletes competed next-to or fully naked.
Fouchè’s point, however, is well-taken – that technology is an inherent part of sports and we haven’t yet sorted out all the equities involved. That would involve more competition for adherence to given athletic and commercial viewpoints than the games themselves. – Doug Bedell
Comments
Leave a Comment
If you would like to make a comment, please fill out the form below.
Recently
- Presentations With Forethought
- Technical Writing’s Lineage – Surely It’s Deeper than Digital
- At the Holidays, Twitting Amazon
- Successful Cookie Baking – From Mom, an Acknowledged Expert
- Slides for a Tech Writer’s Craft
- Digital or Not, Be Clear
- Being Watchful About Digital Designs…
- When Proposals Don’t Click, Keep Making Them Anyway
- Like a Good Gardener, Help an Enterprise Keep Itself Current
- We’re Leaders All, And Need to Think That Way
Categories
Archives
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
Blogroll